Markwayne Mullin indicated in a recent interview that he is considering pulling U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents from airports in sanctuary cities. The proposal has ignited political debate, as it could significantly affect international travel to and from some of the country’s busiest airports.

---

The Reason Behind the Move

Mullin cited his belief that sanctuary city policies, which limit local cooperation with federal immigration authorities, are “not lawful.”

He questioned why city governments do not enforce federal immigration laws, suggesting that withdrawing customs agents could pressure these cities to comply.

---

Potential Impact on Airports and Travel

Removing CBP agents from airports could create major logistical and operational challenges:

• Delays in processing international passengers
• Potential suspension of certain international flights
• Economic consequences for airports and related industries

Major airports in sanctuary cities, including hubs in California and New York, could be particularly affected.

---

Political Context

The proposal comes amid ongoing political battles between Republicans and Democrats over:

• Funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
• Border Patrol resources
• Immigration enforcement policies in sanctuary jurisdictions

Democrats argue that sanctuary policies protect vulnerable communities, while Republicans contend that federal laws must be enforced uniformly.

---

Reactions and Controversy

Experts warn that removing customs agents could:

• Disrupt global travel networks
• Hurt businesses dependent on international travel
• Escalate political tensions between federal and local authorities

Critics also highlight that such a move could face legal challenges and logistical hurdles.

---

What’s Next

Homeland Security has not confirmed whether the plan will be implemented. For now, it remains under consideration while political negotiations continue over immigration funding and policies.

---